Tayassu
pecari
White-lipped peccary |
Taxonomy | Description
| Reproduction | Ecology
| Behavior | Distribution
| Conservation | Remarks
| Literature |
| Taxonomy
-
Tayassu pecari [Link, 1795].
-
Citation: Beitr. Naturgesch., 2:104.
-
Type locality: French Guiana, Cayenne.
The initial taxonomic record (above) is taken from Wilson and Reeder (1993).
The white-lipped peccary was originally named Sus pecari, due
to its superficial resemblance to true pigs (Suidae). Five subspecies
are generally recognized. March (1993) lists them (in geographical
order) as Tayassu pecari ringens (Southern Mexico to northern Nicaragua),
T. p. spiradens (southern Nicaragua to Colombia), T. p.
aequitorius (south-western Colombia and north-western Ecuador), T.
p. pecari (from Colombia to Brazil, north of the Amazon river), and T.
p. albirostris (the southern part of the peccary's range, south of the
equator). Mayer and Wetzel (1987) recognized five subspecies, but included
T. p. albirostris as a synonym for T. p. pecari, giving the
range for this subspecies as that for March's T. p. albirostris.
These authors recognized T. p. beebei as a valid subspecies,
occupying the place of T. p. pecari in northeastern South America
as described by March (1993). Invalid synonyms for T. pecari
include T. aequatoris, Sus albirostris, T. beebei,
Dicotyles labiatus, T. ringens, and T. spiradens (Mayer
and Wetzel, 1987; Wilson and Reeder, 1993).
General Characteristics
There is little difference between male and female white-lipped peccaries,
both in size and general appearance (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987; Nowak, 1991).
Reported measurements are very similar, with body length between 90
and 140 cm, shoulder height 40-60 cm, and body weight 25-40 kg.
Reported measurements for white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari) |
| Source |
Adult Weight |
Head & Body Length |
Shoulder Height
|
Tail Length |
| Kiltie, 1982 |
25-40 kg |
- |
- |
- |
| Mayer and Wetzel, 1987 |
25-40 kg |
90.5-139 cm |
40-53 cm |
1.0-6.3 cm |
| Schmidt, 1990 |
25-40 kg |
95-120 cm |
40-60 cm |
3.0-6.5 cm |
The bristly pelage of the white-lipped peccary is an overall dark reddish-brown
or black, with each hair being two-toned: light at the base, and then dark
for the distal three-quarters (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987; Schmidt, 1990; Nowak,
1991). The hair on the sides of the body is short (2.8-6.0 cm in length),
while the hair along the upper back may be up to 11.5 cm long (Mayer and
Wetzel, 1987). These longer hairs form an erectile crest which can
be raised (usually when the animal is excited) to increase the apparent size
of the animal. The inguinal (groin) and pelvic regions are light cream
in color (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987)
Like all peccaries, T. pecari has a body form very similar to Old
World pigs, Family Suidae (Mayer
and Wetzel, 1987). The rounded body is supported by long, slender legs
(Mayer and Wetzel, 1987). The hooves are small, and while dewclaws
are paired in the forelimbs, there is only a single medial dewclaw on the
hind legs - this species, therefore, has the same number of toes as the tapirs
(Tapiridae,
Perissodactyla) (Mayer and Wetzel,
1987). A gland located on the lower back (approximately 10 cm long and
5.5 cm wide) produces a distinctive, pungent odor (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987;
Schmidt, 1990). The gland exudes its secretions though a nipple-like
projection found just above the origin of the tail (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987).
The tail is small (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987; Schmidt, 1990).
The face is elongated, and terminates in a naked nasal disc supported by
cartilage (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987). The ears are rounded, 6.4-9.0 cm
long, and held erect (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987). The head is the same
brown-black color as the rest of the body, except for the namesake white
lips. These striking stripes of white hair run from the corner of the
mouth to the jowls and under to the throat, extending up to the tip of the
chin on the lower jaw (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987; Schmidt, 1990; Nowak, 1991).
Ontogeny and Reproduction
The breeding season(s) of the white-lipped peccary are highly variable depending
on location. T. pecari may breed throughout the year, for example
in Mexico and Suriname, or may have a strictly defined breeding season dependent
on food resources (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987; Schmidt, 1990). March (1993)
reports breeding in Peru to peak between July and August, while in Chiapas,
Mexico this season extends from April to November. Altrichter et
al. (2001), studying T. pecari in Corcovado National Park, Costa
Rica, observed a marked increase in copulations in the first half of February,
noting that the resulting births occurred in July and August during
the peak of fruit availability. Following this, a second burst of breeding
activity (presumably post-partum) occurred in July and August (although with
few successful pregnancies). Roots (1966, in Mayer and Wetzel, 1987)
reported two breeding seasons in captivity, noting that females became receptive
3 weeks, and again 7 weeks, after parturition.
156-162 days is often quoted as the gestation period of white-lipped peccaries,
derived from three captive individuals at Dudley Zoo (Roots, 1966 in Mayer
and Wetzel, 1987). This is corroborated by observations of wild peccaries,
which give birth approximately 5 months after breeding (Altrichter et
al., 2001). The great majority of births are twins, although
occasionally a singlet or triplets are born (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987; Schmidt,
1990). Young weigh 1,100-1,350 grams at birth (Schmidt, 1990).
Neonates are born with a reddish brown coat, with a dark brown or black middorsal
stripe and cream-colored underparts and legs (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987; Schmidt,
1990). Mayer and Wetzel (1987) report that young are born with the
characteristic white rostrum, while Schmidt (1990) states that neonates do
not possess cheek markings. After a tan intermediate stage, young achieve
their adult coloration in their second year (Schmidt, 1990). Babies
stick closely to their mothers (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987). Altrichter
et al. (2001) did not observe any nursing activity between January
and April among Costa Rican peccaries, inferring that young are weaned by
6 months of age. Young may suckle until they are three-quarters the
size of their mother (Altrichter et al., 2001)
Sexual maturity is reached between one and two years of age (Schmidt, 1990;
March, 1993). The maximum recorded life span is 13 years, 3 months
(Crandall, 1964 in Mayer and Wetzel, 1987; Schmidt, 1990).
Ecology
The white-lipped peccary inhabits numerous habitat types across its large
range (Nowak, 1991). This species typically prefers dense, humid tropical
forests, usually with primary growth, although they are found in drier regions,
including dry savannas, the Paraguayan Chaco, and tropical dry
forests (Schmidt, 1990; March, 1993). In any case, T. pecari
stays close to a source of water (Nowak, 1991; March, 1993). Habitat
selection, and seasonal movements between habitats, is driven by availability
of fruit (Carillo et al., 2002). In Corcovado National Park,
Costa Rica, T. pecari utilized primary forest most during the period
of February to May, corresponding with the peak in fruit production there.
Likewise, secondary and coastal forests were used by peccaries during
the main fruiting period from June to September (Carillo et al., 2002).
White-lipped peccaries are a major prey species of the jaguar (Panthera
onca), and are also hunted by puma (Puma concolor) (Mayer and
Wetzel, 1987; Schmidt, 1990; Carillo et al., 2002). White-lipped
peccaries enjoy a fearsome reputation, and these large cats will typically
kill only solitary individuals or the last animal if the group is travelling
in a column (Schmidt, 1990). American President Theodore Roosevelt,
while travelling in Brazil, reportedly found a jaguar which had been killed
by peccaries (Schmidt, 1990). Although these two cat species are the
only documented non-human predators of T. pecari, several authors
also count the boa constrictor (Boa murina) as a predator (see Mayer
and Wetzel, 1987).
T. pecari is omnivorous, although there is a marked preference for
fruits in the diet (March, 1993). In a study of stomach contents from
34 animals collected in Amazonian Peru, Kiltie (1981a) found that plant
reproductive parts (i.e., fruits, nuts, and seeds) comprised 61% of stomach
contents, followed by vegetation (39%). Trace amounts of animal content
(including invertebrates) were found in 82% of stomachs in the same study.
Despite the high proportion of fruit material consumed by this species,
the majority of seeds are well-masticated, discounting the theory that the
white-lipped peccary plays a role as a seed disperser (Kiltie, 1981a).
Anecdotal reports of food items taken by white-lipped peccaries include
fruits, leaves, roots, seeds, fungi, worms, insects, frogs, lizards, turtles,
bird eggs, and carrion (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987; Schmidt, 1990; March, 1993).
More than 40 plant species have been identified in the diet of this
species, including wild figs (Ficus sp.) and the seed pods of Acacia
aroma (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987; March, 1993). However, palm
nuts appear to be particularly favored, including those of Astrocaryum
sp., Mauritia flexuosa, Jessenia sp.,
Iriartea ventricosa, and Socratea exorrhiza (Kiltie, 1981a;
Kiltie, 1982). White-lipped peccaries are well-adapted to cracking
these tough nuts, as dislocation of the jaw is prevented by the canine teeth,
which interlock and prevent any sideways motion (Kiltie, 1981a; Schmidt,
1990; Nowak, 1991). Because of the hard exterior of palm fruits, few
other animals are able to consume them, providing the white-lipped peccary
with a food reservoir when other fruits become rare (Kiltie, 1982).
Nevertheless, several rodent species apparently hoard the nuts at the
bases of trees, a habit which peccaries exploit by selective foraging (Kiltie,
1981b). T. pecari is sometimes reported to raid crops (Mayer
and Wetzel, 1987).
Behavior
T. pecari is the only large neotropical mammal to form large herds,
and thus plays a significant role in the region's ecology (March, 1993).
While anecdotal accounts of herds exceeding 2,000 animals exist (see
Mayer and Wetzel, 1987), groups typically contain 40-300 animals. Smaller
herds are usually found in drier regions, or where there is greater hunting
pressure (Kiltie and Terborgh, 1983 in Mayer and Wetzel, 1987). Large
groups contain animals of both sexes and all ages (Schmidt, 1990; Nowak,
1991). Ten herds observed by Altrichter et al. (2001) in Costa
Rica contained 21-70 animals, while groups with 100-200 animals are frequently
observed in Peru (Nowak, 1991). On the Atlantic coast of Brazil,
Keuroghlian et al. (2004) tracked a population of peccaries containing
around 150 animals. While these animals shared the same home range,
they were frequently divided into three to four subherds (each containing
47.2 individuals on average) which were separated temporally in their
visits to the same regions. Between these subherds there was a high
frequency of movement (one individual was a member of three subherds in 13
months), although the authors were unable to measure this quantitatively
due to a low number of marked individuals. Keuroghlian et al.
(2004) observed that two subherds occasionally fuse into larger aggregations
for a few months, while other authors report this same phenomenon in different
terms, implying that large groups are the norm, and may break up into smaller
herds during certain seasons due to food availability (March, 1993).
Several theories have been proposed as to why this species forms such
large aggregations, including an increased efficiency at foraging for a food
source with a clumped distribution or predator defense (see Mayer and Wetzel,
1987).
Herds inhabit large home ranges, estimated to be 60-200 km2 for
animals in the Peruvian Amazon (Kiltie and Terborgh, 1983 in March, 1993).
However, other authors, through radiotracking, have found some herds
inhabit much smaller areas; a herd of around 150 animals (split into three
subherds) in Brazil lived in an area 18.7-25.5 km2 in size
(Keuroghlian et al., 2004), while the range of a herd in Costa Rica
covered 32-38 km2 (Carillo et al., 2002).
Population densities as low as 1.0-1.6 animals per km2 have been
reported, although in Brazil there may be as many as 4.5-9.3 peccaries per
km2 (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987; Nowak, 1991; Keuroghlian et al.,
2004). The adult sex ratios of herds is strongly skewed towards females,
with 1.4-1.8 females per male (Altrichter et al., 2001).
With such a large number of herd members, it is necessary for white-lipped
peccaries to constantly move in order to obtain enough food. Often
described as nomadic, a herd can cover about 10 km per day (Kiltie and Terborgh,
1983 in March, 1993; Schmidt, 1990; Nowak, 1991). These animals may
use regular trails and travel in single file, but some observers have reported
that peccaries move in compact groups and may forage away from the route
in a criss-cross fashion (see Mayer and Wetzel, 1987). A great proportion
of the time budget of T. pecari is spent feeding (34%) and moving
(33%) (Altrichter et al., 2002). The rest of the day is spent
resting (28%), interacting with conspecifics (3%), and engaging in other
activities. During months when fruit is scarce, Altrichter et al.
(2002) observed a decrease in the time spent resting, as more time was spent
foraging.
Herds are kept together by a combination of physical, olfactory, and acoustic
contact (Schmidt, 1990). Throughout the day, animals continuously bump
their snouts into other members of the herd, keeping them in close contact
(this behavior also seen in the collared peccary
(Pecari tajacu), but only when individuals rejoin the herd or
settle down to rest) (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987; Schmidt, 1990). Despite
the strong odor of the dorsal gland, there have been no observations of
white-lipped peccaries using the secretions for territorial markings (March,
1993). It therefore appears that its main function is in forming a
group identity, with reciprocal grooming spreading an individual's scent
to the rest of the group, forming a herd-specific scent (Schmidt, 1990).
T. pecari has a large vocal repertoire, and members of a herd
are usually in contact acoustically, which is especially important when
travelling through dense vegetation (March, 1993). The contact call,
made while travelling, is a low growl or moan, but white-lipped peccaries
will also clatter their teeth and bark sharply during conflict, and use a
deep bark as an alarm call (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987). Adults and juveniles
also make a raspy bleat (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987). While the distinctive
white lip markings have been suggested as a visual stimulus, aiding in
conspecific recognition (Schmidt, 1990), the usefulness of this in dense
rainforest seems unlikely.
The white-lipped peccary is primarily diurnal, although some authors report
that activity is centered around dawn and dusk, indicating a crepuscular
lifestyle (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987). Carillo et al. (2002) found
radio-collared peccaries to have activity peaks in the morning (centered
around 0900 hours) and afternoon (1500). This species may extend its
hours of activity into the night when the moon is full (Mayer and Wetzel,
1987). T. pecari can reportedly swim well (Schmidt, 1990).
They appear to enjoy wallowing in mud or dust, and in the dry season
do so during the midday hours (Schmidt, 1990; Nowak, 1991; Carillo et
al., 2002).
Distribution
From southern Mexico south to southern Brazil and northern Argentina, at
altitudes as low as sea level to as high as 1,900 meters. T.
pecari was introduced to Cuba in 1930 (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987).
Countries: Argentina, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica,
Ecuador, El Salvador (extinct), French Guiana, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras,
Mexico, Nicaragua, Panamá, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay (extinct), and
Venezuela (March, 1993).
Range Map (Adapted from March, 1993)
Conservation Status
The white-lipped peccary is not listed by the IUCN (2004), but is listed
on CITES Appendix II (2005) under a blanket listing for the Tayassuidae.
Although not immediately endangered, T. pecari is threatened
by deforestation and increased hunting pressure (March, 1993). With
a home range nine times greater than sympatric
collared peccary (Pecari tajacu),
white-lipped peccaries require extensive, continuous tracts of land are far
more impacted by human encroachment and fragmentation (March, 1993;
Keuroghlian et al., 2004). This species is economically important,
and one of the principal game species for neotropical hunters (Mayer and
Wetzel, 1987).
Remarks
Captive white-lipped peccaries have been known to interbreed with the collared
peccary (Pecari tajacu), and on at least two occasions produced offspring
which survived to maturity, although it is not known if the hybrids were
fertile (see March, 1993).
Tayassu is derived from tayasú, the the Tupi-Guarani
name for peccary (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987).. Pecari (and the
derived form "peccary") is a Cariban name for peccaries meaning "an animal
which makes many paths through the woods" (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987; Gotch,
1995).
-
-
Local names (Mayer and Wetzel, 1987).
-
Tayasú tanyihka ti, tanyihka ti, pecari labiado, queixo branco,
queixada, and tayasú tiragua [Argentina]
-
Tagnicate, Tâchycâtí [Chaco, Paraguay]
-
Senso, marina [Mexico]
-
Pingo, witlippeccarie [Suriname]
-
Jagilla, tayasu citam, baquira, pécari, and pecarí
[Honduras]
-
-
French
-
Le pécari à lèvres blanches (Schmidt, 1990)
-
Le pécari aux babines blanches (Schmidt, 1990)
-
Le pécari à barbe blanche (Schmidt, 1990)
-
-
German
-
Weißbartpekari (Schmidt, 1990)
-
Bisamschwein (Schmidt, 1990)
-
-
Spanish
-
El chancho cariblanco (Altrichter et al., 2002)
|
Literature
Cited
Altrichter, M., C. Drews, E. Carrillo, and J. Saenz. 2001. Sex
ratio and breeding of white-lipped peccaries Tayassu pecari (Artiodactyla
: Tayassuidae) in a Costa Rican rain forest. Revista de Biología
Tropical; 49(1): 383-389.
Altrichter, M., C. Drews, J. C. Saenz, and E. Carrillo. 2002.
Presupuesto de Tiempo del Chancho Cariblanco (Tayassu pecari)
en un Bosque Hu´medo de Costa Rica. [Time budget of the white-lipped
peccary (Tayassu pecari) in a Costa Rican Rainforest]. Biotropica;
34(1): 136-143.
Carrillo, E., J. C. Saenz, and T. K. Fuller. 2002. Movements
and activities of white-lipped peccaries in Corcovado National Park, Costa
Rica. Biological Conservation; 108(3): 317-324.
CITES (Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild
Flora and Fauna). 2005. Appendix I, II, and III as adopted by the Conference
of the Parties, valid from 23 June 2005. Available online at
http://www.cites.org/
Gotch, A. F. 1995. Latin names explained: A guide to the scientific
classification of reptiles, birds, and mammals. New York: Facts on
File, Inc.
Keuroghlian, A., D. P. Eaton, and W. S. Longland. 2004. Area
use by white-lipped and collared peccaries (Tayassu pecari and
Tayassu tajacu) in a tropical forest fragment. Biological
Conservation; 120(3): 411-425.
Kiltie, R. A. 1981a. Stomach contents of rain forest peccaries
(Tayassu tajacu and T. pecari). Biotropica; 13(3): 234-236.
Kiltie, R. A. 1981b. Distribution of palm fruits on a rain forest
floor: why white-lipped peccaries forage near objects? Biotropica;
13(2): 141-145.
Kiltie, R. A. 1982. Bite force as a basis for niche differentation
between rain forest peccaries (Tayassu tajacu and T. pecari).
Biotropica; 14(3): 188-195.
March, I. J. 1993. The White-lipped Peccary (Tayassu
pecari). In Pigs, Peccaries and Hippos: Status Survey and
Action Plan. Edited by W. L. R. Oliver. Gland, Switzerland:
IUCN. Available online at
http://iucn.org/themes/ssc/sgs/pphsg/Contents.htm
Mayer, J. J., and R. M. Wetzel. 1987. Tayassu pecari.
Mammalian Species; 293: 1-7.
Nowak, R. M. [editor]. 1991. Walker's Mammals of the World (Fifth Edition).
Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Schmidt, C. R. 1990. Peccaries. In Grzimek's
Encyclopedia of Mammals. Edited by S. P. Parker. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Volume 5, pp. 48-55.
Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder [editors]. 1993. Mammal Species of the World
(Second Edition). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Available online at
http://nmnhwww.si.edu/msw/
Additional Resources
Altrichter, M., and R. Almeida. 2002. Exploitation of white-lipped
peccaries Tayassu pecari (Artiodactyla : Tayassuidae) on the Osa
Peninsula, Costa Rica. Oryx; 36(2): 126-132.
Altrichter, M., J. C. Saenz, E. Carrillo, and T. K. Fuller. 2000.
Dieta estacional del Tayassu pecari (Artiodactyla: Tayassuidae)
en el Parque Nacional Corcovado, Costa Rica [Seasonal diet of Tayassu pecari
(Artiodactyla : Tayassuidae) in Corcovado National Park, Costa Rica].
Revista de Biología Tropical; 48(2-3): 689-701
Altrichter, M., E. Carrillo, J. Saenz, and T. K. Fuller. 2001.
White-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari, Artiodactyla : Tayassuidae)
diet and fruit availability in a Costa Rican rain forest. Revista de
Biología Tropical; 49(3-4): 1183-1192.
Barreto, G. R., and O. E. Hernández. 1988. Aspectos
bioecológicos de los báquiros (Tayassu tajacu y T.
pecari) en el Estado de Cojedes: Estudio comparativo. Tesis de licenciatura.
Esc. de Biol., Univ. Central de Venezuela, Caracas: 98 pp.
Bodmer, R. E., T. G. Fang, and L. Moya. 1988. Estudio y manejo
de los pecaríes (Tayassu tajacu y T. pecari) en la Amazonia
Peruana. Matero. Univ. Nal. de la Amazon¡a Peruana. Lima 2: 18-25.
Dubost, G. 2001. Comparison of the social behaviour of captive
sympatric peccary species (genus Tayassu); correlations with their
ecological characteristics. Mammalian Biology; 66(2): 65-83.
Dubost, G., C. Dutertre, and O. Henry. 2003. Body weight increase
in the two peccary species of the genus Tayassu (Tayassuidae,
Artiodactyla). Mammalia; 67(1): 55-63.
Dutertre, C., G. Dubost, F. Feer, O. Henry, and R. Mauget. 2001.
Behaviours of collared and white-lipped peccaries (Tayassu tajacu
and T. pecari) in relation to sexual receptivity of the female.
Acta Theriologica; 46(3): 305-318.
Figueira, M. D., C. R. O. Carrer, and P. B. S. Neto. 2003. Weight
gain and evolution of a wild white-lipped peccaries under extensive and
semi-extensive systems, on a Savanna area. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia;
32(1): 191-199.
Fragoso, J. M. V. 1994. Large mammals and the community dynamics
of an Amazonian rain forest. PhD dissertation, University of
Florida,Gainsville.
Fragoso, J. M. V. 1998. Home range and movement patterns of
white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari) herds in the northern Brazilian
Amazon. Biotropica; 30(3): 458 469.
Fragoso, J. M. V. 1999. Perception of scale and resource partitioning
by peccaries: behavioral causes and ecological implications. Journal
of Mammalogy; 80: 993 1003.
Fuller, T. K., E. Carrillo, and J. C. Saenz. 2002. Survival of
protected white-lipped peccaries in Costa Rica. Canadian Journal of
Zoology; 80(3): 586-589.
Gottdenker, N. L. 2003. Resource availability relative to
white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari) populations in a Bolivian tropical
forest landscape. Ecological Society of America Annual Meeting Abstracts;
88: 126.
Kiltie, R. A. 1980. More on Amazon Cultural Ecology. Current
Anthropology; 21: 541-546.
Kiltie, R. A. 1981a. The function of interlocking canines in
rain forest peccaries (Tayassuidae). Journal of Mammalogy; 62(3): 459-469.
Kiltie, R. A., and J. Terborgh. 1976. Ecology and behavior of
rain forest peccaries in southern Peru. National Geographic Research
Report: 873-882.
Kiltie, R. A., and J. Terborgh. 1983. Observations on the behavior
of rain forest peccaries in Perú: why do white-lipped peccaries form
herds?. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie; 62: 241-255.
Maffei, L. F. 2003. Age structure of two hunted peccary species
in the Bolivian Chaco (Tayassu tajacu and T. pecari).
Mammalia; 67(4): 575-578.
*Pontes, A. R. M. 2004. Ecology of a community of mammals in a seasonally
dry forest in Roraima, Brazilian Amazon. Mammalian Biology; 69(5):
319-336.
Sowls, L. K. 1984. The Peccaries. University of Arizona
Press: Tucson. 251 pp.
Waterhouse, J. S., M. Hudson, J. A. Pickett, and P. J. Weldon. 2001.
Volatile components in dorsal gland secretions of the white-lipped
peccary, Tayassu pecari, from Bolivia. Journal of Chemical Ecology;
27(12): 2459-2469.
|
|